The Supreme Court, in its final judgement on Aadhaar upheld the validity of it and further stated that the Aadhar Act does not violate the right to privacy when a person agrees to share his biometric data. However, the Supreme Court barred the private companies from making use of aadhaar card for the purpose of KYC authentication. At the same time the apex court held that aadhaar will still be.
Free 510 words essay on aadhar card for school and college students. Aadhar Card is a boost to Digital India Initiative. Aadhaar Card soon is going to be a mandatory identity card and was initially launched on 28 th January, 2008. It gives each individual a unique 12-digit identity number based on biometrics and information collected by UIDAI. Unique Identification Authority of India is the.
Read Article →The Supreme Court’s (SC’s) landmark judgement upholding our right to privacy has intensified the debate on whether and how Aadhaar infringes on this right. With the upcoming five-judge.
Read Article →Is the Aadhar Act 2016 valid? or Is it violating the Right to privacy of the citizen? (source: DNA) The much-awaited Aadhar Verdict judgement will be declared today on the controversial issue “Is Aadhar valid?” and “Is it violating the fundamental.
Read Article →People s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v Union of India () is related to phone tapping and it discussed that whether telephone tapping is an infringement of right to privacy under Article 21. Supreme Court argued that conversations on the telephone are often of an intimate and confidential character and telephone-conversation is a part of modern man’s life.
Read Article →Protection of data and right to privacyLoopholes attatched to aadhar card as linking it with various services of the governmentAadhar Card has been a highlighted news recently for a lot of controversial reasons.manyaadhar card holders feel that the compulsory policy launched by the government thatbasically asked Indian citizens to link their aadhar card number with their bank accounts andPAN.
Though the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the right to privacy is a landmark move, yet it still does not settle the questions and security concerns surrounding Aadhaar. Aadhaar will have to.
Article 21 guarantees right to life and personal liberty. In August 2015, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court passed an order stating that a larger bench must be formed to decide the questions of: (i) whether right to privacy is a fundamental right, and (ii) whether Aadhaar violates this right. However, the court has not set up a larger.
The Supreme Court has cut straight to the heart of the issue in the Aadhaar petitions. On behalf of all Indian citizens, it asks the current government to address the most basic questions in a democracy governed by the law: what are the privacy rights of its citizens; and are they protected equally, with the same justice for the rich and the poor alike?
Debate on Aadhaar is about right to privacy, not money Moulding public opinion in favour of the law in this backdrop will be all the more difficult for BJP government. 323.
Read Article →The right to privacy being the basic and the first right was decided by the hon’ble supreme court because of the case of MP Sharma and ORS v Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi and Ors.4, in this case the warrant was issued for hunt and seizure of the personal property under the sections 94 and 96(1) of the criminal law was first tested. The hon’ble supreme court had said that the.
Read Article →The entire controversy which now Supreme Court, which is the apex court in India has to deal with now is related to the right to privacy being hampered with the Aadhar Card. Here’s what the filed petitions say. The process of making Aadhar Card and data that government takes from individuals hinder right to privacy of individuals.
Read Article →Right to privacy a fundamental right: 7 Aadhaar controversies that raised concern Critics say Aadhaar, which has information of more than a billion Indians, could be used for identity theft.
Read Article →The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi “There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI.
The above discussion on the right of privacy and dignity with respect to UID clearly shows that the UID, if brought into practice, would discount the right to privacy and dignity guaranteed under the Constitution, and would cause serious implications upon the freedom and choices of the Indian citizen. The UID could also lead to a situation of increased state surveillance, causing an invasion.